Skip to main content

Juran Trilogy in Service Quality


How often have you not purchased a product when the accompanying service was not upto your expectations?  I am sure, several times.  As a keen observer of how I, my family, and others purchase products, I am convinced that increasingly we purchase a product as a package – with the accompanying service.  To add to this we buy a range of services regularly.  Are we then primarily buying services of products?  While writing about quality at Ford, in June 2011, I asked if Ford was a Service company or manufacturing one

This month Paul Borwaski, CEO of ASQ, highlights this question as well.  His question is inspired by a recent Conference Board paper on Answering the Conference Board CEO Challenge. While some wonder if we are predominantly a service economy, I think we are already in one. Unless we are buying iron ore or defense aircrafts.

So what are the things we buy? Groceries, Utilities, Clothing, Food, Entertainment, Phones, Cars… You get the drift.  Most of these products are similar to each other. I haven’t researched many reports, but I can safely say a KFC burger is pretty much same as a Mac. But some of us like KFC and others like Mac. Why? It’s the service and experience that we base our decision on. I have personally switched from a local grocer recently because of how he would talk to some customers. Now what he sold is just the same as the new grocery shop does.  Prices are also same.

In Financial services we buy Loans and Cards and safety of our deposits (with some returns). Survey after Survey shows that most major providers actually offer the same rate (or pretty close to each other).  Still, people, like one over the other. Why? Service makes the difference.

How can quality help? Just as we help in improving products. I would refer Dr J M Juran’s classic work on Juran Trilogy – Quality Planning, Quality Control, and Quality Improvement.

Planning Quality in Services – This is perhaps the most difficult of the three processes.  Services processes have to be more flexible and yet broken down into small steps for staff to deliver this service with ease.  Frontline or customer facing processes need high quality flexible and caring staff to help customers. While quality professionals will develop processes for most situations, there will always be new ones.  Service oriented staff will use common sense in such cases. Frontline processes should be short and crisp while backend processes must be detailed for effective delivery.

Controlling Quality in Services – Service processes are different from manufacturing in one key way.  Customers are part of delivering the service. Controlling a process where customer is a part of the delivery process can be insane.  Some companies try to do this by breaking the process in parts while others prefer to have only one or two staff touch the process.  Michael Hammer would have been happy to see lesser touch points. I personally prefer the lesser touch point method – of course this does not work when some parts of the work are very specialized.

Improving Quality in Services – Of the Juran Trilogy this part is the most similar to manufacturing or improving quality in product.  Established methods such as Kaizen, A3, Six Sigma, and Lean work just as well in services as they do with products.

So, where is the tough part?

Metrics and Measurement – I believe this is where the rubber hits the road.  With very limited experience in management of services, most of us are not sure of the metrics to follow.  If you focus on productivity a bit too much, quality will suffer.  If you focus on Quality, process time will suffer.  Focus on the customer a bit too much and costs will spiral. What metrics to use in what stage of service delivery and maturity is a critical question.  It’s a question with few answers.

Comments

Preeti Singh said…
Absolutely agree..the other challege would be that the front line staff who are the quality ambbassdors are often unable to connect to the big picture as they are limited and enmeshed in their own truncated processes and metrics
Mihir said…
On the question of what metrics to use to measure service excellence or success of the service or the product in question here, I would say that it would be the number of repeat customers that the product or service gets and the satisfaction levels that can be gauged by way of for example - feedback letter, verbal feedback over telephone (tone of voice would be crucial when gauging feedback verbally). If the number of repeat customers are high that means that the desired product or service is good and the customers are satisfied and they would like to repeat that experience again. Hence they keep coming back. Here it is important to note that expectations of the customers keep on increasing every time they are back and they expect the same level of service or features in the product, if not better.
Coco Bostick said…
My comment isn't a contradiction to your idea but a support. I would love to let you know that I am very touch regarding with the contents of your idea cause it was really true. Besides, I'm thinking of the same thing as you but you simplified it more interesting.
Anshuman Tiwari said…
Thanks Preeti, Mihir, and Coco for your comments.
Tushar Ghosh said…
Just wanted to share that I too have come across a situation where in decision to buy an electronic product was influenced by the quality and availability of Service center. The choice was between Sony and Panasonic and despite high price of sony TV it was prefered.
Vedzen Company said…
This is an incredible post about six sigma certification in Pune. Getting such a wide range of benefits is really wonderful. This also a increase the market value. http://vedzen.com/

Popular posts from this blog

Top 10 Quality Gurus in India - Respond with your nominees.

It’s now been over two weeks with the post on ‘Top 10 Quality Gurus of India’ being out on my Blog and three groups on Linkedin.  We have had over 30 responses with multiple nominations.  Here are some quick insights.
My definition of Guru surely was not clear.  People have responded with names of quality managers (good ones I am sure) to P C Mahalanobis.  This points to the lack of clarity in my original post. Apologies.
We are seeking Gurus – so they have to be in between your managers and P C Mahalanobis. Gurus should have had some original and pioneering work. I agree consultants have an advantage here.  These Gurus should have done majority of their work in India.
I will be setting up a small panel to evaluate the nominations.  We have support from ASQ India to help in this study.
We may have to divide the list into Gurus and Leading Practioners (or a similar title).
Early nominations include:
Gurus P C Mahalanobis J J Irani Suresh Lulla R V Ramchandran Essae Chandran Manu Vohra Hans Bajaria G…

Declining Credibility of ISO 9000 Certifications

A friend and fellow Business Excellence Professional, Ramesh Rajagopal, recently asked a very troubling question - Who is responsible for declining credibility of ISO 9000 systems and what is the solution?

He further elaborated saying – In the recent years, ISO 9000 standards is losing its credibility. What role Accreditation bodies, Certification bodies, Top Management and Management Representatives have to play to bring back the spirit of ISO 9000.

Firstly, blame is the wrong word to start with. Why do we have to ‘blame’ someone? We are assuming that ISO 9000 had promised us something huge and delivered a lemon. From what I know, that’s not the case.

It’s critical to understand that ISO 9000 series was developed as a bare minimum standard for management. It did not promote excellence. That was left for the MBNQA.

Having said that I agree that all of us have failed in even maintaining the bare minimum status of ISO 9000. Quality professionals and auditors (all of us) have taken the conve…