Skip to main content

Deliver more for a Raise


Writing about what we get paid or should get paid is a tough ask.  If I argue for a raise, I could be called unreal in tough times; if I argue about no raise, I could be called insensitive to my team; if I ask for a reduction, I am plain mad. Inspite of these risks, Paul Borwaski, CEO of ASQ, has asked this question on his blog. It is possible he has been in a Christmas mood a bit too early. Jokes apart, talking about salary is sensitive and best avoided. But I will take the risk.
Our salaries increasingly depend on what quality function we manage and what outcomes we deliver. Also, how tough are we to replace? Demand and supply law of economics works almost everywhere, and I think it does perfectly well for us as well.
Firstly, I believe there is no longer a shortage of qualified (read certified) quality professionals and this reflects in stagnant wages for the last year. Black Belt certification is now a commodity and Lean is seen more as a sub-set of Six Sigma than a separate improved discipline. As a result, these certifications don’t automatically attract increased wages.
Second, most quality professionals don’t deliver enough value. I have written about this earlier and am convinced that many of us join the profession thinking it is an easy cushy job. And this hurts the entire community. I agree that the value we deliver is tough to identify – for example, multiple audits may still not reduce the risk of a big failure. I think each quality professional should be able to deliver value anywhere between five to ten times of his/her wages.
Assessing value for quality professionals is easier if you work in improvement. Most project benefits can be quantified and if this value is anywhere between five to ten times your wages – you are safe and can even expect a raise.  Life is tough for professionals in other quality functions. Auditing and Quality Control is no longer a domain of ‘only’ quality professional and this drives salaries down.
Finally, exclusivity and an impression of indispensability are critical to salary hikes.  If the skills and results you bring to the table are unique and much more than what anyone else will – you can expect a raise. Certifications alone won’t help if you don’t have a record of delivering on stretch goals.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Top 10 Quality Gurus in India - Respond with your nominees.

It’s now been over two weeks with the post on ‘Top 10 Quality Gurus of India’ being out on my Blog and three groups on Linkedin.  We have had over 30 responses with multiple nominations.  Here are some quick insights.
My definition of Guru surely was not clear.  People have responded with names of quality managers (good ones I am sure) to P C Mahalanobis.  This points to the lack of clarity in my original post. Apologies.
We are seeking Gurus – so they have to be in between your managers and P C Mahalanobis. Gurus should have had some original and pioneering work. I agree consultants have an advantage here.  These Gurus should have done majority of their work in India.
I will be setting up a small panel to evaluate the nominations.  We have support from ASQ India to help in this study.
We may have to divide the list into Gurus and Leading Practioners (or a similar title).
Early nominations include:
Gurus P C Mahalanobis J J Irani Suresh Lulla R V Ramchandran Essae Chandran Manu Vohra Hans Bajaria G…

Juran Trilogy in Service Quality

How often have you not purchased a product when the accompanying service was not upto your expectations?  I am sure, several times.  As a keen observer of how I, my family, and others purchase products, I am convinced that increasingly we purchase a product as a package – with the accompanying service.  To add to this we buy a range of services regularly.  Are we then primarily buying services of products?  While writing about quality at Ford, in June 2011, I asked if Ford was a Service company or manufacturing one
This month Paul Borwaski, CEO of ASQ, highlights this question as well.  His question is inspired by a recent Conference Board paper on Answering the Conference Board CEO Challenge. While some wonder if we are predominantly a service economy, I think we are already in one. Unless we are buying iron ore or defense aircrafts.
So what are the things we buy? Groceries, Utilities, Clothing, Food, Entertainment, Phones, Cars… You get the drift.  Most of these products are si…

Declining Credibility of ISO 9000 Certifications

A friend and fellow Business Excellence Professional, Ramesh Rajagopal, recently asked a very troubling question - Who is responsible for declining credibility of ISO 9000 systems and what is the solution?

He further elaborated saying – In the recent years, ISO 9000 standards is losing its credibility. What role Accreditation bodies, Certification bodies, Top Management and Management Representatives have to play to bring back the spirit of ISO 9000.

Firstly, blame is the wrong word to start with. Why do we have to ‘blame’ someone? We are assuming that ISO 9000 had promised us something huge and delivered a lemon. From what I know, that’s not the case.

It’s critical to understand that ISO 9000 series was developed as a bare minimum standard for management. It did not promote excellence. That was left for the MBNQA.

Having said that I agree that all of us have failed in even maintaining the bare minimum status of ISO 9000. Quality professionals and auditors (all of us) have taken the conve…