Skip to main content

Making ASQ Truly Global

In his recent post on A View from the Q, Bill Troy, the new ASQ CEO, has raised a very key issue. That of engaging members and volunteers in member based organizations such as ASQ.  This is an issue which bothers ASQ a lot. Like many member based organizations ASQ has its challenges in growing memberships. As Chair of the Bangalore ASQ team I face this challenge on a regular basis.

Let’s examine this situation. Most of my analysis is based on volunteering for ASQ in India.

Why do members join ASQ?
  • Members join mostly for the discounted certification fee when you become a paid member.
  • Members want events where knowledge is shared – something they can take back to their companies and implement
  • Members want networking for mentoring and career opportunities
  • Members want to be part of something bigger and global and derive pride from the same
  • Members want to rise up in the recognition ladder – become a Fellow, win ASQ awards etc.

Why do members not renew their membership? (Again, this is truer for India)
  • Members don’t see VFM – value for money once they are certified
  • Knowledge sharing isn’t enough and is often generic
  • Members don’t get career leads and get frustrated
  • While ASQ has improved its online connect with members they still don’t feel they are part of something big and global (ASQ is still seen as American)
  • ASQ’s recognition program is not very rewarding for non-Americans.

In addition to the above when I speak with senior quality professionals and members of other professional bodies (such as PMI) there are some more factors that emerge.
  • ASQ has very limited presence in Asia – this is where the action is
  • ASQ has very limited influence with large tech companies
  • ASQ hasn’t launched anything big in years. Can’t only depend on an annual conference and certifications.

I have been involved with ASQ in India since 2006 and been a member since early 2000s. I have worked with members and volunteers for ASQ for over eight years. In this period I have seen good progress. Here are some key pluses:
  • ASQ has opened up to the fact that it has be more global (Self-awareness is step one of improvement)
  • The office in India is now established. It has had some hiccups but seems settled now. The India office was a goal of the informal ASQ group – QualityFirst
  • The local member community model – LMC is now established and even tried globally. Bangalore was a pioneer here
  • More engagement opportunities with Webinar series (notable Dr Manu Vora has helped a lot).

With this background, what do we think could be done to engage more members and volunteers? Here is a wish list:

1. Membership fee linked to Purchasing Power Parity. Almost all members feel ASQ fee are too high at current pricing for India. I have spoken about this for over eight years an at the WCQ in May 2014 I asked Stephen Hacker (Then Chair) and Cecilia Kimerlin (Now Chair) about linking membership fee to PPP – purchasing power parity. I believe we have to bite this bullet now. PMI has reduced second year feel to 50% for select countries. If ASQ reduces fee to 1/4th I am convinced their revenue will remain same with increased membership.

2. ASQ India Conference. ASQ has to make a reasonable splash in India. The Indian Quality community is pretty large and no one is bringing it together. If ASQ does not do so soon, someone else will. Several leading quality professionals globally have Indian roots. They can easily help make the conference a success.

3. More local events.  An assured method of more engagement with members in a city is to have regular events. Two to four hour seminars every alternate month is ideal. Bangalore and Ahmadabad has been doing these events regularly and has benefited from the same.

4, More webinars. With most Indian cities having terrible traffic issues, members find it difficult to travel to events. Webinars are ideal for this. ASQ Delhi office and Dr Manu Vora have done a wonderful job in last six months to collaborate on a webinar series. We are now working to have an ASQ Fellow speaker series. More of this will help in improving engagement.

5. Recognition across ASQ awards, magazines etc. ASQ has surely woken up to the need of recognizing its members globally and not just in Americas. More of this is needed. Ideas include:
  • India specific project contest
  • India specific Quality Progress (or an online version)
  • Invite and honor senior professionals – this attracts potential members
  • Partner with reputed publications and organizations
6.Encourage volunteers. Volunteers are the backbone for ASQ. They give their personal time for little gain. ASQ must find ways to reward and recognize this effort.

7. New products and services: ASQ has to reach out to the new tech community. Blogs like Techcrunch are bigger than ASQ already. Some ideas include:
  • Take MBNQA global
  • Have tech world division to attract Microsoft, Google, Yahoo, and the Apps industry
  • Regional conferences


Much of the above may read like one man’s rant. I can however, assure you that all the above is based on my discussions with quality professionals over the last decade or so. ASQ has done many things right in the last five years but much more is required for it to be truly global. 

Comments

Ajith Prabhu said…
Create a mechanism for quality professionals to get jobs. Membership interest will increase
CyrilSunil said…
I agree with your views.

Awareness on ASQ should start from the school and college level.
Good post. ASQ wake up! It is an opportunity to lead quality initiatives on a truly global scale. I bet the White House, when contacted, will find a pretty good sponsorship for this kind of initiative... Just call the right number!...:o) P.S. I cannot do it for you, I am a Canadian.
I can easily identify myself with the reasons for joining ASQ and not renewing in the second year. Having certified as SSBB in 2005, I couldn't earn my 18 points because Indian training, seminars, conferences were not recognized then. It changed later, but most of the reasons cited resound well with my not renewing.
Anshuman, I generally agree with your views. I have been a member of ASQ since 1994 that is nearly 20 years now and earned quite a few certifications. These helped me in building up a different orientation to my career. We had a brainstorming session at Pune LMC recently and generated a few ideas. We also have roughly an event every quarter at Pune and had some extremely thought provoking expert presentations on subjects such as reliability, design of experiments etc. Hope to do better in future.

Hemant Urdhwareshe
Pune LMC
Praveen Kumar said…
It's very true ASQ in India has many gaps to promote quality. in the sphere of 120crore indians and 2% quality experts so far are still not tied in the unity becoz of a missing common platform. ASQ can do it better otherwise someone else will.

Popular posts from this blog

Top 10 Quality Gurus in India - Respond with your nominees.

It’s now been over two weeks with the post on ‘Top 10 Quality Gurus of India’ being out on my Blog and three groups on Linkedin.  We have had over 30 responses with multiple nominations.  Here are some quick insights.
My definition of Guru surely was not clear.  People have responded with names of quality managers (good ones I am sure) to P C Mahalanobis.  This points to the lack of clarity in my original post. Apologies.
We are seeking Gurus – so they have to be in between your managers and P C Mahalanobis. Gurus should have had some original and pioneering work. I agree consultants have an advantage here.  These Gurus should have done majority of their work in India.
I will be setting up a small panel to evaluate the nominations.  We have support from ASQ India to help in this study.
We may have to divide the list into Gurus and Leading Practioners (or a similar title).
Early nominations include:
Gurus P C Mahalanobis J J Irani Suresh Lulla R V Ramchandran Essae Chandran Manu Vohra Hans Bajaria G…

Juran Trilogy in Service Quality

How often have you not purchased a product when the accompanying service was not upto your expectations?  I am sure, several times.  As a keen observer of how I, my family, and others purchase products, I am convinced that increasingly we purchase a product as a package – with the accompanying service.  To add to this we buy a range of services regularly.  Are we then primarily buying services of products?  While writing about quality at Ford, in June 2011, I asked if Ford was a Service company or manufacturing one
This month Paul Borwaski, CEO of ASQ, highlights this question as well.  His question is inspired by a recent Conference Board paper on Answering the Conference Board CEO Challenge. While some wonder if we are predominantly a service economy, I think we are already in one. Unless we are buying iron ore or defense aircrafts.
So what are the things we buy? Groceries, Utilities, Clothing, Food, Entertainment, Phones, Cars… You get the drift.  Most of these products are si…

Declining Credibility of ISO 9000 Certifications

A friend and fellow Business Excellence Professional, Ramesh Rajagopal, recently asked a very troubling question - Who is responsible for declining credibility of ISO 9000 systems and what is the solution?

He further elaborated saying – In the recent years, ISO 9000 standards is losing its credibility. What role Accreditation bodies, Certification bodies, Top Management and Management Representatives have to play to bring back the spirit of ISO 9000.

Firstly, blame is the wrong word to start with. Why do we have to ‘blame’ someone? We are assuming that ISO 9000 had promised us something huge and delivered a lemon. From what I know, that’s not the case.

It’s critical to understand that ISO 9000 series was developed as a bare minimum standard for management. It did not promote excellence. That was left for the MBNQA.

Having said that I agree that all of us have failed in even maintaining the bare minimum status of ISO 9000. Quality professionals and auditors (all of us) have taken the conve…